MLB: Toronto Blue Jays at Tampa Bay Rays

J.A. Not Happy With The Status Quo

This piece was co-authored by Chris Sherwin.

It’s no secret that J.A. Happ is a different pitcher from the one we saw back in 2013 and 2014 for the Toronto Blue Jays. He’s also a different pitcher than he was in Seattle. As you may know, a whole lot of that credit goes to Pittsburgh Pirates’ pitching coach, Ray Searage.

When Happ arrived in Pittsburgh, he was supposed to add some depth and reliability to a young rotation that was pushing for a postseason berth. However, after Happ’s Pittsburgh debut went very poorly, Ray Searage studied his bullpen sessions and quickly found a flaw. Essentially, he felt Happ wasn’t striding directly towards home plate, which ended up wasting too much upper body movement and affecting his arm slot.

Interestingly, this is the same mechanical adjustment the Jays staff tried to make during Happ’s previous tenure with the club. In Houston, Happ’s mechanical flaws included poor balance and posture, inconsistent stride length and heavy trunk tilt. This conflicted with an organizational philosophy in Toronto; they want their pitchers to take a direct line to the plate. It took some time, but they were able to slowly remove a lot of the wasted upper body movement in Happ’s delivery and straighten him out. Below is an example of how much he changed from his Houston days to his first in Toronto.

4YearTilt (1)

With a much more controlled movement pattern and direct line, Happ creates extra hip rotation and separation, which also keeps him more balanced. The results were an increase in velocity, a more natural arm slot and improved command. However, even with the positive mechanical tweaks, Happ was still plagued with bouts of inconsistency. His mechanics would be perfect at times, but he couldn’t maintain it. Repetition is vital for a pitcher to , and Happ would frequently rush his movement patterns and create mechanical inefficiencies, affecting both velocity and command.

In Pittsburgh, Searage noticed something extra: Happ was rushing and over-rotating in his delivery. This altered his arm slot, making it easier for hitters to pick up the baseball. Searage shut Happ down for 10 days to fix the rotation issues and Happ responded. Take a look at Happ’s release points from August 14th (his first start back) until the end of the season:

Happ Release points

As you can see, Happ’s release (both vertical and horizontal) showed way more consistency than his time in Seattle. As a direct result, Happ was able to have greater command of his pitches. The result was a run that saw Happ end the season with a 1.37 ERA in his final 10 starts, with batters hitting just .201/.240/.285 during that stretch. Instead of rotation depth, the Pirates got an ace.

In Pittsburgh, Searage helped Happ to consistently find the best balance and posture that he would only show occasionally in Toronto. Below is an example of his average trunk tilt in Pittsburgh matched up to his best from his early Toronto days.

Untitled3 (1)

It’s still early in the 2016 season, but Happ has been able to maintain the steady mechanics, and the results have been there:

HappBostonTilt (1)

Since Happ has kept up the steady mechanics from his time in Pittsburgh, one would assume he was doing everything else the one again put up excellent numbers. Well, if you’ve been reading here and elsewhere lately, you’ll know that’s not remotely the case. Last week in our Roto Review, we outlined how Happ has been using more curveballs in games where he was generating more groundballs. Then last week Nick Ashbourne of Sportsnet.ca pointed out that Happ had also switched his fastball usage from fourseamers to twoseamers, which also would contribute to fewer strikeouts and more grounders.

On the surface, that would seem to explain away some of the differences, but in reality, it goes far deeper than that. If you clicked on the link to the Sportsnet piece, you would have seen this chart which displays the change in fastballs:

Brooksbaseball-Chart (7)

As you can see, Happ has indeed increased his sinker usage greatly while drastically reducing reliance on the fourseamer. But if you just look at that chart, it’s hard to get a true sense of what else he’s doing. Because the fourseam was thrown so often in Pittsburgh, the scale on that graph makes the offspeed pitch rates look flat. In reality, they were anything but:

Brooksbaseball-Chart (14)

By removing the fastballs from the graph, we can see that Happ is throwing essentially the same amount of cutters, but has increased both his curveball and changeup usage. The curveball rate has risen from 8 percent to 12.5 percent, and he is throwing the changeup seven percent of the time, up from five with the Pirates. And even though the cut fastball has the same usage rate, the pitch itself is totally different.

Brooksbaseball-Chart (15)

Happ is now throwing his cutter is being thrown nearly 1.5 inches harder and the pitch now has 1.5 fewer inches of drop. So we have pitches thrown at completely different rates, and the lone outlier is essentially a brand new pitch with new shape and velocity. Essentially, J.A. Happ has an entirely different repertoire. If the goal is to become a more efficient pitcher, it makes sense that Happ would try something different.

It would probably be enough to stop there, but stuff and usage are just part of what make a pitcher successful. The other equally (if not more) important factor is location. One of the big changes that Happ made once he got to the Pirates was that he started using the entire plate as opposed to living mostly away (to both righties and lefties) as he had done previously (with both Toronto and Seattle). With the increased fastball usage, that switch made sense. It’s hard to get outs when you’re only throwing heat to one spot. Well, with the change is repertoire, comes a change in pitch location:

trumedia_baseball_grid (3)

In the early going this season, Happ is pounding the ball to his arm side. Once again, this makes sense with his pitch usage (Note, Happ has faced 115 RHBs and just 17 LHBs, so the analysis will be focusing on pitch usage to righties). Twoseam fastballs get more movement on the arm side, and there is far less risk of a ball running back over the plate. It also avoids the traditional power area for most hitters, making it harder to pull the ball. Similarly, throwing changeups and breaking balls away is a good strategy, as the timing issues created by the slower pitches causes balls to be hit off the end of the bat for easier outs. In fact, the only pitch that Happ throws with any consistency inside to righties is the cutter:

trumedia_baseball_heatmap (1)

With the pitch becoming more of a true cutter (or slutter) as opposed to the slider version he was throwing in previous years, Happ has a weapon to bust in on RHBs hands to keep them from just sitting on the outside corner against his other offerings.

All of these things, when taken together make sense for a man trying to generate more soft contact to get quick outs. But what about the strikeouts? After all, Happ has been a pretty decent strikeout pitcher throughout his career with a strikeout rate hovering right around average. This year however, Happ’s strikeout rate has fallen to a meager 15.2 percent, which is well below league-average. Well, not to worry Blue Jays fans, as J.A. Happ can still get a strikeout when he needs to.

trumedia_baseball_grid (6)

As you can see, Happ completely changes his approach with two strikes. Instead of pounding the fastball low and away, he uses the entire plate and works at the top of the zone. As a result, his strikeout rate once he gets to two strikes is thirty percent, which is right in line with his career average of 31 percent.

So Happ has cleaned up his mechanics and changed his repertoire to get quick outs early in counts, but is still collecting strikeouts when he gets to two strikes. That sure sounds like a good combination for success.

Now, it should be mentioned that Russell Martin and Pete Walker probably deserve some of the credit for this. As outlined by John Lott in a great piece for Vice, Happ is focusing on working quicker and trusting his catcher more. Given that information, it is in fact likely that Russell Martin has had a profound impact on these changes. But that being said, Happ still had to buy into all of this. It would have been very easy for him to come in and insist on doing the same things that made him one of the best pitchers in all of baseball during the second half of last season. Instead, he came in and said ‘let’s make this even better.’

That’s the sign of a pitcher who really wants to be the best, and the Jays and their fans should be very Happy to have J.A.

Lead Photo: Reinhold Matay-USA TODAY Sports
Pitch Velocity and Release charts courtesy of Brooks Baseball
Heat Maps and Grids courtesy of TruMedia

Related Articles

3 comments on “J.A. Not Happy With The Status Quo”

Jonathan

Why did you do that to me with the headline?

Great article, though!

Joshua Howsam

Heh, thanks for the compliment, and sorry about the pun. Had to be done.

Patrick Cashman

Great article, lousy title. From the title I thought he wanted big changes with the Blue Jays and was unhappy there. The article was totally different from the title.

Leave a reply Cancel reply

Use your Baseball Prospectus username