Drew Storen Named Setup Man; A Temporary Loss for Progressive Thinking

Just yesterday it was announced that Roberto Osuna, the 21-year old Mexican who single handedly kept the bullpen looking somewhat respectable over the first two months of the 2015 season, would again be acting as the fireman at the back-end of John Gibbons’ bullpen to start the 2016 season. While Osuna did absolutely nothing to lose the job as Joshua Howsam discussed yesterday, I can’t help but feel the Blue Jays took the lesser of two admittedly good options.

Since being acquired from the Nationals for Ben Revere over the winter, many, myself included, had expected that Storen would become the ninth inning guy for a couple of reasons, neither of which involve his salary or proximity to free agency. Over his six year career Storen has made two points quite clear: one, he’s not a pitcher who is capable of throwing multiple innings in an outing, and two, he’s a whole lot better when coming in with a clean slate. To the former point; over his 355 career appearances, Storen has averaged just 2.82 outs and 3.86 batters faced per relief appearance. To the latter; Storen has faced a total of 761 batters with the bases empty, and they’ve hit just .212/.258/.317 against him. That impressive slash line is largely fueled by a terrific strikeout-minus-walk rate of 21.7 percent. Conversely, in the 609 situations with runners on base, Storen has allowed hitters a .238/.329/.341 slash line, due in part to a far less inspiring 9.8 percent strikeout-minus-walk rate.

In his admittedly brief career, Roberto Osuna’s strengths have complemented Storen’s weaknesses, which makes him far better suited for setup duty in the short term. Osuna averaged 3.07 outs and 3.99 batters faced per relief appearance last season, and while both are just modest improvements over Storen’s figures, as I wrote last week, both seem poised to grow considerably in 2016. John Gibbons was quoted in USA Today earlier this spring, saying “Osuna can give you more than one inning. Drew’s probably limited to one inning. That’s kind of who they are.” Multi-inning closers haven’t really been a thing since the eighties and nineties, which was a strong indicator that ol’ Gibbers was leaning the same way as the masses. Conversely, setup men have become more and more flexible in their deployment over recent years, with the Yankees’ Dellin Betances being the poster boy for this creative and modern thinking. The hard throwing converted-starter has averaged 3.63 outs and 4.67 batters faced per appearance over the last two seasons, with 69.4 percent of those batters coming to the plate in medium- or high-leverage situations.

Osuna has been dominant in situations with runners on, in both direct comparison to Storen and to himself. With the bases empty, batters hit .201/.250/.410 against Osuna (including five of the seven home runs he allowed), whereas with runners on, the opposition’s triple slash line fell to an abysmal .174/.230/.277. This difference can be attributed to the two pitchers’ contrasting backgrounds, as Storen was drafted as a reliever and has exclusively been a reliever throughout his professional career. Osuna, on the other hand, was a starting pitcher through-and-through prior to undergoing Tommy John surgery in early 2013, and again pitched in the rotation upon his return to the mound in late 2014. Starting pitchers unquestionably get more practice in trouble situations, as a manager isn’t going to immediately retrieve his starter if they give up a string of hits in the early innings like he would a struggling bullpen arm.

It makes little sense to have Storen working as a setup man with his left-handed twin, Brett Cecil, already back there as a one-and-done pitcher. By allowing Drew Storen to reign over the ninth inning, manager John Gibbons would have instantly created a multitude of options by which to script getting the ball from the hand of his starter into the basket of victory. He would be better able to play matchups in the seventh and eighth inning when opposing managers deploy their bench, before having Storen come in with the bases empty in the ninth to squelch any hope that remains. After correctly naming Aaron Sanchez as the fifth starter on Monday, the front office and coaching staff had given themselves the opportunity to get on a bit of a roll with progressive thinking and fan satisfaction. Instead, we face the possibility of an under-utilized Roberto Osuna in the short term, and a career arc suddenly pointed straight at the back end of the bullpen in the long term. For the sake of the pitching staff, and just as importantly for Osuna’s development and future earning potential, hopefully this decision is only temporary.

Lead Photo: Kim Klement-USA TODAY Sports

Related Articles

5 comments on “Drew Storen Named Setup Man; A Temporary Loss for Progressive Thinking”


Alhough I too would have preferred the alternative for similar reasons, the current alignment doesn’t entirely exclude progressive thinking.

For example, Gibbons showed last year he is willing to use Osuna for more than three outs, even from the “closer” role. This helps in several ways.

Let’s say Chavez is pitching the 7th and gets himself in trouble. Men on third and second, two outs. Jays have a one run lead.

Ideally, you bring on your best pitcher: Osuna.

In the current alignment, I’d bring in Cecil vs a lefty, or Storen vs a righty.

You then have two good options for the 8th. More likely, Cecil/Storen starts the 8th and you have Osuna ready to come on if anyone gets on base. Even better, If Osuna’s well rested, you might even get him going for two innings, especially if the first batter of the 8th will have the platoon advantage vs Cecil or Storen.

Kyle Matte

It’s entirely possible that Osuna will break the norm and occasionally be used in longer outings, but having Osuna pitch a 2 inning save almost guarantees he’s unavailable the next day, forcing the team to have a second closer in waiting for a possible save opportunity.

I just think it’s more streamlined to have your closer be the one inning guy who could pitch back to back nights, or three nights out of four, and have your setup men pitching in the more unusual, extended situations that could result in extended layoffs.


But in Storen, the Jays do have a second closer. The other strategic way to use Storen and Osuna is to minimize the number of times they both pitch in a game so that one is always available.


While I don’t disagree with the thinking expressed, my initial reaction is to wonder how often it’s likely to matter. For one thing, how often will situations arise where the Jays will want any of their late-inning RPs to get more than three outs? For another, it seems reasonable to think that such situations might happen less often once Loup is available to come in and face one or two LHBs.

Other RPs may factor in as well. For instance, if Sanchez winds up back in the pen, he seems like an option in 4-out situations. Or maybe Floyd turns out to be this year’s Hendriks, Biagini shows he can handle more than mop-up duty, etc.

Kyle Matte

With his changeup being his best non-fastball pitch, I think Osuna is very well equipped to get more than three outs against any handed hitters — either in the 7th/8th when Cecil is unavailable, or in the 8th/9th if Storen isn’t. Neither Cecil nor Storen offers the multi inning flexibility from the setup spot, and I’m struggling to see Gibby planning on using Osuna for a 2 inning save even if one of those two is unavailable. If a situation dictates it, maybe he enters in the 8th, but I just don’t think six out saves will be planned.

Leave a comment

Use your Baseball Prospectus username